Friday, December 18, 2009
Final Project
Friday, November 20, 2009
FInal Project Idea
I would also really love to make a mocumentary. I love mockumentaries so much, but I don't know if it would be realistic to make one. I just now thought of this idea, so I really don't hae a concrete concept for it, but If i think of one I'll post it. I love "Summer Heights High" and that would probably be one of my main inspirations, along with other mockumentaries like the office.
Animation
This is the beginning and end of my animation project. In the beginning, I'm doing my homework, oblivious to the fact that the purple bottle next to me keeps flashing in and out with eyes and a face and the world around me is animated. In the middle part, which is not here at the moment, the objects in the room are going to come to life, having a party and building relationships until I come back, when they hurry into their spots and go into hiding. However, a diet coke can doesn't manage to run back to it's place in time, and ends up on the desk when it wasn't there before. I proceed to drink the diet coke while the hairspary bottle looks in in sadness. I think they're in love....
Friday, October 23, 2009
Experimental Composition

This composition deals with the ideas of organized music, or something with a rhythm, and chaos, and what you get when you combine the two. Personally I find listening to disorganized or chaotic sound very displeasing, so I wanted to somewhat expand on that compared to something steady, and therefore pleasing to listen to (to me). My score is very open ended. The pink line ontop represents a chaotic sound. The blue like represents a non rhythmic, but not necessarily chaotic sound. The yellow line is a sound with a rhythm that doesn't have to correspond with the other rhythms. The blue line with the green verticals represents two different constant rhythms that work in conjunction with each other. The fact that all the colors and lines are in one clump means to play these sounds all
at once. The fact that this is so open ended means it's going to be completely different for every person. An "organized" or "disorganized" sound is different for every person, and depending on whose creating the song, it could be very coherent. I like the idea of giving people an outline and letting them do as they please in terms of creating a song.
Sunday, October 18, 2009
If anything is music...
If anything can be music, I think the type of music worth making is music that makes people listen to sounds in a different way. I think experimental music does this in part. For example, Cage’s 4:33 makes people suddenly aware of all the sounds that exist in a time frame that should be “silent”. Suddenly people are hearing themselves breathe and think, or hearing people’s feet shuffling, and thinking about these sounds in a new way. I also think music worth making should evoke emotion or some kind of reaction from listeners.
What makes a combination of sound worth listening to?
In my opinion, humans as a race strive to understand things and experience things in some kind of order. For this reason I think the kind of music worth listening to is organized sound, something that makes sense without being too predictable. To me, something worth listening to is not random, for everyday life is random, and I’m always hearing sounds at random. In terms of music, I want the sounds to be organized, to have some type of rhythm or repeating pattern. If the sounds are organized and pleasant, I will pay more attention to them. This is just what’s pleasing to me, though. This is not to say that random or disorganized sound is not worth listening to for some. I think there’s a lot of merits to making people listen to random sound for 4 minutes and 33 seconds in the mental confines of considering the happenings in those 4 minutes and 33 seconds music.
Friday, October 9, 2009
Commercial Project
Thursday, September 24, 2009
New York Times Reading/Situationist Resistance in Today's World
Would Situationist strategies of resistance work today? Would a credit
card company be able to predict and neutralize any resistance in
advance?
I think it’s pretty impossible for situationists to resist all forms of conformity and pre-made decisions in today’s world, and a lot of their resistance would be so unnoticed as to completely ineffective. So many things that have become an integral part of everyday life are also collecting information about us and telling us what to do.
Using the Internet for example has become so every-day, that the student who does not have a computer in the United States is at a huge disadvantage, even in the public school systems, which are supposed to be free. This student suddenly has to get into a car and go to the library to access information for homework and assignments. But what if that student doesn’t have a car, something that society is also constantly telling us that we need? Public transportation would be the next option, but what happens if the students’ town doesn’t have very good public transit, or the busses don’t run very late? Suddenly this student is jumping through hurdles to complete an assignment that a kid with a computer could get done very easily and quickly, and at their own leisure without worrying about what time the busses run, when the library closes, or if someone can give them a ride. The public school system, and higher education as well for that matter is telling us that in order to be a good student, we must have access to the Internet. But everything we do on the Internet can potentially be traced. Everything we write online is floating out in cyberspace, and it’s very hard to remove all traces of it.
In some ways boycotting or resisting something like the internet could end up being more detrimental than it is worth, especially for students. But to break down this hypothetical even further, society tells us that to be a good student, we must have a computer. Alternately, society also tells us we must constantly be good students, or we will never get a good job. But the definition of a “good job” has been completely convoluted by an obsession with money and it’s ties to happiness that the definition is constantly changing.
If someone chose to go without education, they would likely not have a high paying or extremely thought provoking job. This would be detrimental to quality of life in that it would be hard to pay for things like a house, electricity, and food. But who says having things like a house, electricity, and food are absolute necessities? Society tells us. Who says that the low paying job isn’t a good job? Maybe the person is very content in their low paying job. Society tells us.
This internet example applies to credit cards. How do you realistically function in society without a credit card? Art you at a disadvantage? Probably. But if you do get one, how do you resist company profiling and psychoanalysis? You don’t. It’s impossible.
Resisting everything is impossible. The thought process that goes along with this question is infinite. I could write about it forever. I’m sure there are some people out there who have resisted things like internet, but how do I know? It doesn’t show up on my google newsfeed, on facebook, on tv, or in the newspaper. So it resisting really affective? In some regards, I would say no, because making a statement without anyone noticing is not really making a statement at all.